Photo of Stefanie Jackman

Stefanie Jackman

Subscribe to Stefanie Jackman's Posts

Stefanie takes a holistic approach to working with clients both through compliance counseling and assessment relating to consumer products and services, as well as serving as a zealous advocate in government inquiries, investigations, and consumer litigation.

Follow:Read more about Stefanie JackmanStefanie's Linkedin Profile

On December 16, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) released a special edition of its Supervisory Highlights, detailing a range of activities identified by CFPB examiners across the student loan origination and servicing markets. According to the Bureau, student loans represent the second-largest form of U.S. consumer debt at more than $1.7 trillion in total outstanding balances. The Bureau has been heavily focused on student lending issues for the past several years, and this latest special edition of Supervisory Highlights underlines that focus.

On December 10, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it is distributing more than $540,000 in refunds to victims of an abusive debt collector group. The debt collectors allegedly threatened consumers with lawsuits or arrest for debts that they might not have even owed.

In a significant development in the ongoing litigation over the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB or Bureau) Final Rule on credit card late fees, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied the CFPB’s motions to dismiss the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, transfer the case to the District of Columbia, and dissolve the preliminary injunction. This ruling follows the court’s earlier request for further briefing on the issue of associational standing, as discussed in our prior blog post, here.

Earlier this month, we discussed the lawsuit filed by ACA International, LLC and Collection Bureau Services, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) and Director Rohit Chopra. The lawsuit challenges the CFPB’s October 1, 2024 advisory opinion on medical debt collection practices. The plaintiffs are seeking an order vacating the advisory opinion and a stay of the effective date pending the conclusion of the case.

Join Chris Willis and his colleague Stefanie Jackman as they delve into the recent amendments to New York City’s debt collection rules. In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, they discuss the significant changes, including communication restrictions, validation requirements, and the expanded coverage to include creditors. Learn about the implications for both creditors and debt collectors, the enforcement mechanisms, and the ongoing legal challenges. Stay informed and prepared for the April 1, 2025, enforcement date.

On November 13, Representative Gary J. Palmer (R-AL) introduced House Joint Resolution 220, which seeks congressional disapproval of an advisory opinion published by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) relating to medical debt collection practices.

In this special joint episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast and Moving the Metal, Chris Willis teams up with Brooke Conkle and Chris Capurso, hosts of the Moving the Metal podcast, to discuss the CFPB’s recent supervisory highlights on auto-finance and auto-servicing. Joined by Stefanie Jackman, a partner experienced in auto-finance servicing and collections, the team delves into the CFPB’s findings on issues ranging from repossessions and servicing practices to optional products and credit reporting. They explore the implications of these findings and provide insights into the regulatory landscape, emphasizing the importance of compliance and timely remediation. Tune in for an in-depth analysis of the CFPB’s focus areas and what they mean for the auto-finance industry.

In our previous post, we discussed the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection’s (NYC DCWP) decision to delay the enforcement of the amended debt collection rules from December 1, 2024, to April 1, 2025. This postponement was in response to industry concerns and a legal challenge filed by ACA International, Inc. and Independent Recovery Resources, Inc. Since then, NYC DCWP also announced it would delay the effective date for the amended rules to April 1, 2025 to align with the enforcement date.

Late last month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit against Global Circulation, Inc. (GCI) and its owner for engaging in deceptive and abusive debt collection practices. According to the FTC, the Georgia-based debt collector tricked consumers into paying more than $7.6 million in bogus debt. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, alleges violations of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act).

As discussed here, on February 15, 2024, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved amendments to the rules and regulations implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). These amendments were purportedly aimed at strengthening consumers’ ability to revoke consent to robocalls and robotexts. Last month, the FCC announced that the new rules go into effect on April 11, 2025.