The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced new effective dates for amendments to rules under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) aimed at strengthening consumer protections against robocalls and robotexts. These amendments, published on March 5, 2024, will take effect on April 11, 2025.
On October 2, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in support of several banking associations’ motion for a preliminary injunction against the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act (IFPA). The IFPA, signed into law in June 2024, prohibits credit or debit card issuers and any other entities involved in processing electronic payments from charging an interchange fee on the tax or gratuity portions of a transaction. Additionally, the Act, which is set to take effect in July 2025, restricts banks and other entities from using transaction data for purposes other than processing the transaction, except as required by law. Several banking associations quickly challenged the Act, seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent its implementation. They argue that the IFPA is preempted by federal law, unconstitutional, and invalid.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently denied a credit repair organization’s motion for partial summary judgment and granted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’s motion for summary judgment in a case alleging violations of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), and Massachusetts state law. The significant penalties and restitution ordered in this case highlight the severe consequences of non-compliance with federal and state regulations governing credit repair services.
In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis is joined by Partners Mark Furletti and Jason Cover to delve into the CFPB’s recent interpretive rule that classifies buy now, pay later (BNPL) products as credit cards under Regulation Z. The discussion unpacks the controversy surrounding this rule, the subsequent FAQs released by the CFPB, and the broader implications for the BNPL industry. The episode explores the challenges and ambiguities posed by the rule, potential compliance strategies, and the likelihood of legal challenges. Tune in for an insightful analysis of one of the year’s most debated regulatory developments in consumer finance.
On October 7, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) published the Fall edition of its Supervisory Highlights, focusing on examinations of the auto-finance market completed between November 1, 2023, and August 30, 2024. The report highlights significant findings across various aspects of consumers’ experiences with vehicle finance, including origination disclosures, repossession activities, servicing practices, the handling of add-on products, and credit reporting.
To keep you informed of recent activities, below are several of the most significant federal and state events that have influenced the Consumer Financial Services industry over the past week:
On October 4, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation. This case will address a critical question that has been a point of contention among various circuit courts: whether the Hobbs Act, which limits judicial review of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) “final orders” to appellate courts, requires district courts to accept the FCC legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). While the Supreme Court previously addressed whether the Hobbs Act applied in private litigation, it ultimately did not resolve whether a district court is required to follow a particular FCC order interpreting the TCPA.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s decision denying a defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, underscoring the importance of clear and conspicuous notice in online arbitration agreements. Although the decision involves an arbitration provision in an online application for employment, it echoes lessons imparted by courts in cases involving consumer arbitration agreements. Read more here.
On October 1, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) issued an advisory opinion aimed at debt collectors and emphasizing their obligations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Regulation F. The opinion specifically emphasizes the prohibitions on false, deceptive, or misleading representations, and unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect medical debts.
In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis delves into the latest annual report from the CFPB’s Office of Servicemember Affairs. While the report is ostensibly about issues affecting military personnel, it primarily highlights ongoing challenges in student loan servicing. Chris discusses key findings, including customer service obstacles, errors in income-driven repayment plans, and the contentious practice of transcript withholding. This episode underscores the CFPB’s persistent focus on these issues and the implications for the student loan servicing industry. Tune in for a comprehensive analysis and stay informed about the regulatory landscape.