Photo of David M. Gettings

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and associated FCC regulations, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and many similar state consumer protection statutes.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission jointly filed an amicus brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLP.  In the case, a U.S. district court previously ruled that a debt collection law firm violated the Fair Debt Collection

The next “Debt Collection Dialogue” with the Federal Trade Commission is scheduled to occur in Dallas on September 29, 2015.  It is the second of three such planned events.  Representatives will discuss enforcement actions, consumer complaints, compliance issues, industry best practices, and the process for regulatory enforcement investigations and actions.  The panel will include Commission

On August 3, the Eleventh Circuit held in Ewing Industries Corporation v. Bob Wines Nursery, Inc., et al., that a proposed class action accusing a Florida nursery of sending unsolicited faxes did not suspend the statute of limitations for a later-filed proposed class action challenging that same conduct, despite the fact that the

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuits increased 16 percent from June 2014 to June 2015, according to a report issued by WebRecon.  The report also noted that FDCPA lawsuits increased from 885 to 1,129 from May to June this year.  According to the report, Fair Credit Reporting Act lawsuits also increased 22.7 percent from

On June 25, Senator Schumer of New York introduced a bill poetically titled the Act to Quell Unnecessary, Intentional, and Encroaching Telephone Calls Act of 2015 (the “QUIET Act”) that would criminalize the knowing use of telemarketing robocalls without the prior express consent of the recipient.   

Under the QUIET Act, it would be illegal to

Although most states have consumer protection laws that provide for private rights of action, certain states also hold that such remedies cannot be invoked and pursued on behalf of a class.  However, when such a case is filed in federal court, such state-based restrictions conflict with the class action mechanism that is set forth under

On June 30, in Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A., the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held in a case of first impression that representations made by an attorney in court filings during the course of debt-collection litigation are actionable under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) but that

On Friday, July 10, the Federal Communications Commission enacted major changes and clarifications to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”). Approved on a contentious 3-2 vote by the FCC commissioners, the FCC released its Declaratory Ruling and Order (FCC 15-72) formally stating its interpretation of numerous provisions of TCPA.

The TCPA

A growing number of state and local governments have “banned the box” by prohibiting inquiry into a job applicant’s criminal history at the initial application stage.  This summer saw a number of additional state and local proposals in this regard, some of which became law and others of which were rejected.   

Connecticut House Bill 6875

The Federal Communications Commission recently announced the agenda for its upcoming June 18 Open Meeting.  The agenda includes a number of items on which the Commission is considering action.  Of those items on the agenda, few are more important to many financial service companies than the Commission’s focus on “Protecting Consumers Against Unwanted Robocalls.” 

According