In a recent case, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California partially dismissed a consumer’s claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case is Bodie v. Lyft, No. 3:16-cv-02558-L-NLS (S.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2019).
Plaintiff Jason David Bodie’s complaint alleged that he received two unsolicited text messages from a
Time Warner Cable is fighting back against a purported Telephone Consumer Protection Act wrong number class action lawsuit. In Hunter and Villa v. Time Warner Cable Inc., No. 1:15–cv–06445 (S.D.N.Y), plaintiffs Leona Hunter and Anne Marie Villa allege that defendant Time Warner Cable engages in a “practice of making
On January 28, Crunch Fitness filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Marks v. Crunch San Diego. Crunch contends that the Ninth Circuit rewrote the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) and contradicted the plain text and
On January 17, in Kibbee v. Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., No. 2:18-cv-01848, a putative class action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, the Court entered an order notifying the United States Attorney General that the constitutionality of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act has been called into question and giving
Nearly every American with a cellphone has had it happen to them. You receive a call from an unknown number with an automated message pitching refinance options for the loan you don’t have, or consolidation options for the student loan you already paid off.
In a new report released by Hiya, a Seattle-based spam-monitoring service,
In Ewing v. Encore Solar, LLC, No. 3:18-cv-02247 (S.D. Cal. January 22, 2019), plaintiff Anton Ewing filed a suit against defendants Encore Solar, LLC; Sunrun, Inc. (“Sunrun”); Bargain Electricity, Inc. (“Bargain Electricity”); and individual employees of Encor and Bargain Electricity for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Ewing alleged that all defendants were liable
2018 was a busy year in the consumer financial services world. As we navigate the continuing heavy volume of regulatory change and forthcoming developments from the Trump administration, Troutman Sanders is uniquely positioned to help its clients successfully resolve problems and stay ahead of the compliance curve.
In this report, we share developments on
On January 15, amicus briefs were filed in the much awaited Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) case currently before the Supreme Court, PDR Network LLC, et al. v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic. Following filing of PDR Network’s opening brief, which we discussed here, four amici filed briefs: State and Local Government Associations;
In Thompson-Harbach v. USAA Fed. Sav. Bank, No. 15-cv-2098-CJW-KEM, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3687 (N.D. Iowa Jan. 9, 2019), the Northern District of Iowa provided a deep dive into recent Telephone Consumer Protection Act case law and a retrospective look into Federal Communications Commission TCPA pronouncements. After its informative analysis, the Court held that
On January 8, petitioner PDR Network LLC filed its opening brief in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act case before the Supreme Court that could potentially knock out TCPA litigation as we know it. As we explained here, the Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in PDR Network LLC, et al. v. Carlton & Harris