Photo of Jason E. Manning

Jason E. Manning

Subscribe to Jason E. Manning's Posts

Jason Manning is a commercial trial attorney with a focus on defending consumer-facing companies against class action and individual consumer protection claims. He has particular experience representing clients in mortgage- and auto finance-related litigation in state and federal courts.

Follow:Read more about Jason E. ManningJason E.'s Linkedin Profile

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis is joined by Troutman Pepper Locke Partners Joseph DeFazio and Jason Manning, along with Alison Grounds, founder and managing partner of Troutman Pepper Locke’s award-winning eDiscovery subsidiary, eMerge to discuss the evolving capabilities and advantages of eDiscovery. This episode highlights the significance of efficient processes in streamlining document review to enhance legal strategies, including setting clear policies for electronically stored information (ESI) and analyzing vast volumes of digital data with accuracy. As the use of AI becomes more prevalent across the consumer financial services industry, the speakers underscore the impact of leaning into eDiscovery and innovation to help uncover critical evidence early in litigation and response plans, as well as during regulatory investigations.

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis is joined by colleagues Megan Burns, Jason Manning, and Punit Marwaha to explore the arcane world of reverse mortgages. They provide valuable insights about how these unique financial products work, the regulatory landscape, and the litigation hurdles faced by reverse mortgage servicers. Listen to this episode to hear real-life examples highlighting the complexities reverse mortgage servicers may face when dealing with reverse mortgages, including loan origination requirements, the involvement of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration guidelines, alleged third-party fraud, and the sensitivity around elderly borrowers.

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis is joined by Matt Hansen, Jason Manning, and Michael Lacy, partners in Troutman Pepper Locke’s Consumer Financial Services practice group, to discuss the use of mock jury exercises in consumer financial services litigation. They explore what mock jury exercises are, why they are used, and the benefits they provide in preparing for trial. The conversation covers the timing and implementation of these exercises, the insights gained from them, and real-life examples of how they have influenced case outcomes. Tune in to learn how mock jury exercises can help legal teams refine their strategies and improve their chances of success in court.

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis is joined by Jason Manning and Joe DeFazio, partners in Troutman Pepper Locke’s Consumer Financial Services practice group. They provide crucial updates on two significant litigation topics: the ongoing litigation surrounding so-called junk fees, particularly convenience fees, and the implications of New York’s Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA). They delve into the recent Eleventh Circuit decision on convenience fees, the broader impact of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s stance on junk fees, and the challenges posed by FAPA for mortgage lenders and servicers. Listeners will gain insights into the current legal landscape, potential future developments, and practical advice for navigating these complex issues. Don’t miss this essential discussion for anyone in the consumer financial services industry.

On January 27, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a significant opinion holding that the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) does not prohibit the enforcement of arbitration agreements in credit card contracts under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

On April 17, 2024, Virginia enacted HB 1519 taking a significant step towards amending the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) to prohibit creditors from charging fees for accepting electronic payments in connection with credit transactions in Virginia. However, this amendment will not become effective unless the Virginia General Assembly reenacts the bill in 2025. Between now and then, the Virginia State Corporation Commission will assess this change and report its findings to the General Assembly by December of this year.

On May 29, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced a targeted foreclosure moratorium on VA-guaranteed loans intended to allow servicers sufficient time to implement the Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) program. Servicers may begin implementing the VASP program beginning May 31, 2024, and the VA expects servicers will fully implement the program no later than October 1, 2024.

In this episode of FCRA Focus, join host Dave Gettings and fellow partner, Jason Manning, as they delve into Jason’s recent experiences trying a consumer case in front of a jury. Jason and Dave discuss the impact of integrating technology into trial presentation, the strategic use of demonstratives to maintain jury engagement, approaches to breaking the ice in the courtroom, and fostering a more attentive and responsive jury. Whether you’re a legal professional seeking to refine your trial tactics or simply intrigued by the dynamics of courtroom strategy, this episode offers a wealth of first-hand knowledge regarding jury trials in consumer cases.

We are pleased to share our annual review of regulatory and legal developments in the consumer financial services industry. With active federal and state legislatures, consumer financial services providers faced a challenging 2023. Courts across the country issued rulings that will have immediate and lasting impacts on the industry. Our team of more than 140 professionals has prepared this concise, yet thorough analysis of the most important issues and trends throughout our industry. We not only examined what happened in 2023, but also what to expect — and how to prepare — for the months ahead.

In a July 15 published decision, the Fourth Circuit reversed a West Virginia District Court’s ruling against a mortgage servicer in a purported class action, holding that merely sending a notice of rescission under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. 1635, et seq., does not immediately rescind the loan and relieve the borrower…