A recent decision out of the Northern District of Illinois should help banks defend against increasingly common claims involving fraudulent wire transfers. In Trivedi v. Bank of America, et al., the district court granted the defendant banks’ motions to dismiss, holding that the plaintiff’s common law claims were preempted by the Illinois Uniform Commercial
A federal district court in New Jersey recently dismissed a complaint against a bank filed by a commercial customer duped by a business email compromise incident. The case involved four wire transfers totaling $1.4 million dollars. The court found that even though the customer was tricked by a fraudster into initiating the transfers, the wires
In Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Roy J. Elizondo III, PLLC, the Supreme Court of Texas recently held that an administrative form relied upon by a victim of a fraud scam did not impose contractual obligations on a bank to verify available funds before processing the wire transaction.
A Texas lawyer maintained an IOLTA deposit
The U.S. Supreme Court significantly limited the jurisdiction of federal courts to confirm or vacate arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in Badgerow v. Walters. The Court confirmed its prior rulings that the FAA itself does not create subject matter jurisdiction and held that a federal court
The Uniform Commercial Code’s (UCC) midnight deadline rule imposes an obligation on payor banks to return dishonored checks before midnight of the next business day after the date of receipt of the item. The midnight deadline rule states: “If an item is presented and received by a payor bank, the bank is accountable for the
U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, has introduced the Arbitration Fairness for Consumers Act. The legislation, introduced on March 7, proposes to amend Title X of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to prohibit pre-dispute arbitration agreements and class-action waivers in contracts
A North Carolina federal magistrate judge recently denied a furnisher’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a case that involved reporting of historical credit information on a consumer’s closed account. In Newman v. American Honda Finance Corp., No. 1:21CV3, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38993 (M.D.N.C. March 4, 2022), the plaintiff, Tracy Newman, filed
The Eastern District of Pennsylvania is the most recent federal district court to adopt Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Mgmt. Svcs., Inc., 17 F.4th 1016 (11th Cir. 2021) by holding that the transmission of information to a vendor was a “communication” to a “person,” satisfying the “in connection with the collection of any debt”
On January 24, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California took the unusual step of declining to sign off — for the fourth time — on a proposed settlement, resulting from a putative class-action lawsuit against Five Guys Enterprises LLC and its parent Encore FGBF LLC. The lawsuit alleges the popular burger
2021 was a transformative year for the consumer financial services world. As we navigate an unprecedented volume of industry regulation, Troutman Pepper is uniquely positioned to help its clients find successful resolutions and stay ahead of the curve.
In this report, we share developments on auto finance, background screening, bankruptcy, consumer class actions, consumer
