Photo of David N. Anthony

David Anthony handles litigation against consumer financial services businesses and other highly regulated companies across the United States. He is a strategic thinker who balances his extensive litigation experience with practical business advice to solve companies’ hardest problems.

In Redman v. RadioShack Corporation, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18181 (7th Cir. Sept. 19, 2014), the Seventh Circuit held that the lower court erred when it approved a settlement in a class action that was filed under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g), against a company that sold

Flagstar Bank FSB has agreed to pay $37.5 million to settle allegations that it prevented borrowers from accessing foreclosure relief and modifying their mortgage loans, according to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The CFPB claims that Flagstar delayed borrowers’ requests for foreclosure relief, denied loan modifications, and failed to tell borrowers when their applications

Troutman Sanders partner, David N. Anthony, participated in a Strafford webinar early this year titled, “Consumer Debt Collection and New CFPB Regs, Enforcement and Litigation: Game Changers for the Industry.” Due to overwhelming popularity, Strafford scheduled an encore presentation with live Q&A for Tuesday, October 14, 1:00pm-2:30pm EDT.

The panel will provide banking and finance

On September 29, the Eleventh Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., overturning the district court’s prior holding and providing defense-favorable law on prior express consent.  The decision was in response to an unprecedented May 2013 ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of

On October 19-21, 2014, in Denver, CO, the National Association of Professional Background Screeners is hosting their 2014 Annual Conference.

The conference offers a diverse range of educational sessions ensuring that there’s something for the industry novice, the seasoned expert and everyone in between. Every attendee will be able to take away valuable information and

On September 24, U.S. District Judge James S. Moody, Jr., of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, issued a preliminary injunction against several law firms accused by the attorneys general of Connecticut and Florida of charging illegal upfront fees to distressed homeowners in a mortgage rescue scam.

Judge Moody agreed that

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued a decision upholding a district court ruling that several defendants based in the U.S. and Canada deceived consumers through a telemarketing scheme designed to sell them phony mortgage assistance and debt relief programs, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

The Court’s decision

New York Court administrators recently announced new rules impacting cases involving debt collector-plaintiffs with certain debt claims against consumers.  As we discussed on May 7th when the proposed rules were announced, the new rules place a higher burden of proof on debt collector-plaintiffs to establish chain of title and that they actually own the debt

On August 1, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion rejecting federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) and the National Banking Act for a lawsuit filed by the Attorney General of Hawaii on behalf of state residents (sometimes called a parens patriae suit) against financial companies

On September 4, in Tierney et al. v. Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued an order dismissing a putative Fair Credit Reporting Act class action accusing Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp. of violating the FCRA by failing to secure health data stolen from