On October 6, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law the California Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Act. This legislation aims to fortify consumer protections and enhance transparency in the car-buying process. The enactment of this law follows a series of discussions and amendments, as highlighted in our previous blog and podcast, which traced the bill’s evolution and its alignment with the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) vacated CARS Rule.
On September 15, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed into law House Bill 3178, introducing new requirements for auto dealers in the state. This legislation aims to standardize certain aspects of auto finance transactions, specifically those involving retail installment contracts (RICs) or lease agreements, and ensure clarity in the car-buying process. The law will take effect in 2026.
In this episode of Moving the Metal, hosts Brooke Conkle and Chris Capurso from Troutman Pepper Locke’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group are joined by Chris Willis to explore the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) proposed changes to the larger participant rule for auto finance. The discussion delves into the CFPB’s current regulatory activities, including its focus on revisiting and potentially reducing the number of nonbank companies subject to supervision. The team examines the implications of raising the threshold for what constitutes a larger participant in the auto finance market and how this could impact industry dynamics. They also consider the broader regulatory landscape and the potential for future changes under different administrations. Tune in for valuable insights into the evolving world of auto finance regulation and what it means for industry participants.
On September 15, the Court of Appeals of the State of Washington reversed a lower court’s decision in Aaland v. CRST Home Solutions, LLC (CRST), holding that unsolicited text messages sent to recruit independent contractors qualified as “commercial” messages under the state’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA). The decision vastly expands the scope of the state statute.
In this episode of Moving the Metal: The Auto Finance Podcast, Brooke Conkle and Chris Capurso discuss California SB 766, known as the California CARS Rule. They explore the bill’s amendments, including changes to cancellation periods and record retention requirements, and analyze its implications for compliance and litigation in the auto finance industry. The conversation highlights the potential impact of state-level regulation and the possibility of similar legislation in other states. Tune in for insights into how these developments could shape the future of auto finance.
On July 28, the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs issued a reminder to more than 3,000 auto dealerships regarding their obligations under the New Jersey data deletion law, N.J.S.A. § 56:12-18.1. This law, enacted and effective in January 2024, requires dealerships to offer data deletion services for consumer information stored in vehicles accepted for resale or lease. Dealerships are now on notice of their compliance obligations under the law.
In this episode of Moving the Metal: The Auto Finance Podcast, hosts Brooke Conkle and Chris Capurso are joined by Brian Casey, a partner in Troutman Pepper Locke’s Insurance, Transactional, and Regulatory Practice Group. Together, they explore the complex world of vehicle service contracts (VSCs) and ancillary products within the auto finance industry. Brian shares insights into the history and evolution of VSCs, discussing the distinction between insurance and non-insurance products and the regulatory landscape that governs them. The conversation delves into state-specific regulations, licensing requirements, and the impact of privacy laws like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act on the industry. Tune in to understand the intricacies of vehicle service contracts and the challenges faced by providers in navigating this dynamic regulatory environment.
On July 24, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed House Bill 3865 (HB 3865) into law, introducing significant changes to the regulation of telephone solicitations within the state. This new legislation narrows the permissible calling hours, reducing communications during late evening hours by prohibiting calls after 8 p.m., down from the previous 9 p.m. Additionally, the bill expands the definition of telephone solicitations to include text messages.
In this episode of FCRA Focus, host Dave Gettings is joined by Brooke Conkle and Mandi Blackmon to explore the intricacies of a furnisher’s reasonable investigation under Section 1681s-2(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The discussion centers around the Second Circuit’s recent decision in the Suluki case, which addresses the standards for conducting a reasonable investigation in the context of identity theft allegations. The hosts delve into the background of the case, the arguments presented by both parties, and the court’s rationale in affirming summary judgment for the defendant. They also examine how this decision aligns with prior Second Circuit precedent and its implications for compliance and litigation strategies. Tune in for a detailed analysis of how the Suluki decision reinforces the principle that investigations must be reasonable, not perfect, and what this means for furnishers navigating similar claims.
In this episode of Moving the Metal: The Auto Finance Podcast, Brooke Conkle and Chris Capurso from Troutman Pepper Locke’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group examine the current status of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Holder Rule. They discuss its historical context, current interpretations, and future implications, particularly focusing on attorneys’ fees. The conversation highlights the California Supreme Court’s Pulliam decision, which challenged traditional understandings of the rule by allowing for the recovery of attorneys’ fees under certain state laws. Additionally, they examine the FTC’s 2022 advisory opinion, which aligns with Pulliam and broadens the scope of potential claims against holders of credit contracts. Finally, they take a look at the impacts of Pulliam and forecast the future of the Holder Rule in the current regulatory climate. The episode provides insights into how these developments impact auto finance companies and the strategies they can employ to mitigate risks associated with the Holder Rule.