Regulatory Enforcement + Compliance

Subscribe to Regulatory Enforcement + Compliance via RSS

On October 11, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) approved the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation’s (DFPI) proposed regulations on direct-to-consumer (i.e., non-employer offered) earned wage access (EWA) products. This approval marks the culmination of a lengthy regulatory process that began in March 2023 and involved multiple rounds of modifications and public comments. The regulations also impose requirements on debt settlement companies and education financing providers. It will become effective on February 15, 2025.

Yesterday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) issued its final rule on personal financial data rights, purportedly aimed at enhancing consumer control over their financial data and promoting competition in the financial services industry. According to the Bureau’s press release, “[t]he rule requires financial institutions, credit card issuers, and other financial providers to unlock an individual’s personal financial data and transfer it to another provider at the consumer’s request for free… help[ing] lower prices on loans and improve customer service across payments, credit, and banking markets.” Later that same day, a complaint was filed challenging the Bureau’s authority.

Yesterday, we discussed the constitutional legal challenge against New York City’s recently amended debt collection rules, which were scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2024. These rules would stringently regulate various debt collection activities by debt collectors operating in the city. Today, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) announced a delay in the enforcement of these new rules until April 1, 2025.

New York City’s recently amended debt collection rules — scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2024 and which would stringently regulate various debt collection activities by debt collectors operating in the city — have drawn a constitutional legal challenge. Whether this challenge will affect the effective date is yet to be seen. The plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the enforcement of the rules amending Title 6 of the Rules of the City of New York, which they argue are unconstitutional and preempted by federal and state law.

In March 2023, we discussed the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel recurring subscriptions and memberships. The proposed rule was part of the FTC’s review of its Negative Option Rule, which sought to broaden its scope. Publication of the NPRM resulted in more…

On October 15, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that they reached a settlement with Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation (Fairway). This settlement addresses allegations of redlining in majority-Black neighborhoods in Birmingham, Alabama. Fairway is headquartered in Madison, WI, but operates under the trade name MortgageBanc in the Birmingham area. Fairway, the third-largest mortgage lender in the United States, is now the second non-bank mortgage company to enter into a redlining settlement.

On October 10, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a landmark redlining settlement with Citadel Federal Credit Union (Citadel), marking the first such agreement with a credit union in the DOJ’s history. This settlement, the 14th in DOJ’s Combatting Redlining Initiative since 2021, addresses allegations that Citadel engaged in discriminatory lending practices by redlining predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in and around Philadelphia. Under the terms of the proposed consent order, Citadel will pay over $6.5 million to resolve these allegations.

On October 2, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in support of several banking associations’ motion for a preliminary injunction against the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act (IFPA). The IFPA, signed into law in June 2024, prohibits credit or debit card issuers and any other entities involved in processing electronic payments from charging an interchange fee on the tax or gratuity portions of a transaction. Additionally, the Act, which is set to take effect in July 2025, restricts banks and other entities from using transaction data for purposes other than processing the transaction, except as required by law. Several banking associations quickly challenged the Act, seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent its implementation. They argue that the IFPA is preempted by federal law, unconstitutional, and invalid.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently denied a credit repair organization’s motion for partial summary judgment and granted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’s motion for summary judgment in a case alleging violations of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), and Massachusetts state law. The significant penalties and restitution ordered in this case highlight the severe consequences of non-compliance with federal and state regulations governing credit repair services.

On October 7, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) published the Fall edition of its Supervisory Highlights, focusing on examinations of the auto-finance market completed between November 1, 2023, and August 30, 2024. The report highlights significant findings across various aspects of consumers’ experiences with vehicle finance, including origination disclosures, repossession activities, servicing practices, the handling of add-on products, and credit reporting.