In Badeen v. PAR, Inc., et al., the Michigan Supreme Court expanded the definition of “collection agency” under Michigan’s Occupation Code to include forwarders and forwarding companies.

The plaintiff collection agency brought an action against a number of automobile lenders and forwarding companies alleging that the forwarders were operating as “collection agencies” under

On July 16, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) proposed revised debt collection regulations for third-party debt collectors and debt buyers.  The rules seek to clarify the required initial disclosures by debt collectors, disclosures for debts in which the statute of limitations may be expired, substantiation of consumer debts, debt payment procedures,

In a novel ruling, the Ninth Circuit expressly adopted an opinion from the Federal Communications Commission, finding the potential for vicarious liability under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  In Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp., No. 12-56458 (unpublished), the Ninth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s holding that Taco Bell was not vicariously liable under the

On June 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Orlando L. Garcia of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas recommended denial of a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an FDCPA action implicating settlement letter language for time-barred debt. The case, Schreve v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc., involved time-barred debt that

On June 10, 2014, CFPB Director Richard Cordray appeared before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs in conjunction with the May 2014 release of the Bureau’s fifth Semi-Annual Report.  Cordray highlighted a variety of topics, including mortgages, student loans, complaint numbers, and proposed data collection efforts.

Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) questioned

On May 7, 2014, ACA International, the Association of Credit and Collection Professionals, submitted an amicus curiae brief in an important Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) dispute over settlement-letter language for time-barred debts. The plaintiff received a collection letter from the debt collector offering an opportunity to settle a debt after Michigan’s six-year limitations

CFPB Announces Spring 2014 Rulemaking Agenda, Confirms Development of “Larger Participant” Definition for Auto Finance Market

On May 23, 2014, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau posted its updated semi-annual rule-making agenda, which covers several important categories of upcoming regulatory action.

Defining Larger Participants in Auto Lending Market for Regulation

Through use of its rulemaking

On January 23, 2014, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of four lawsuits against debt collectors that challenged validation notices under 1692g(a)(4).

The disputed provision of the letters involved the 30-day language notifying consumes of their right to dispute the debt, which letters read in relevant part:

“Unless you notify this office

Beginning in June, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will provide the public with access to the meetings of the Consumer Advisory Board (CAB)and the CFPB’s three Councils.  Anyone may attend or watch the full meetings live online the same way most other agencies allow under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

As we previously discussed,

On May 22, 2014, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued its spring 2014 supervisory highlights report.  The report zeros in on the debt collection and consumer reporting industries, highlighting numerous violations uncovered at payday lenders, debt collection firms, and consumer reporting agencies.  Specifically, it appears that the CFPB’s largest concerns with these groups surrounds