On June 6, the Attorney General for the State of North Carolina executed a settlement agreement with a payday lender, Future Income Payments, LLC, arising out of the payday lender’s alleged violation of that state’s usury laws.  The settlement agreement requires the lender to pay North Carolina $50,000 in attorneys’ and investigation fees, plus a

Law360, New York (June 30, 2016, 4:42 PM ET) —

The Eighth Circuit’s recent ruling in Sandusky Wellness Center LLC v. Medtox Scientific Inc. on ascertainability deepened a circuit split on one of the most important and challenging class certification issues. Until theU.S. Supreme Court resolves the split, the legal standard for ascertainability

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued a press release last week announcing it has assessed $950,000 in civil penalties against Singapore-based mobile advertising company InMobi for alleged violations of the FTC Act and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (“COPPA”).  The penalty is part of InMobi’s settlement with the FTC over allegations that

In a new class action complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, a Nevada man says that Fannie Mae illegally inquired into his consumer credit information.

According to the complaint in Bailey v. Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), Plaintiff had a home mortgage that was transferred to Fannie Mae.  Plaintiff

On June 17, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced changes to the dollar amount thresholds for certain consumer credit transactions under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). According to the notice submitted to the Federal Register, these new thresholds could affect minimum interest charges and safe harbor penalty fees under the Credit Card

We are pleased to announce that Troutman Sanders partner Ronald I. Raether, Jr. will be a featured speaker at the American Conference Institute’s 13th National Forum on Cyber & Data Risk Insurance in New York City on July 29, 2016.

Ron will participate on a panel entitled, “Working Toward Prevention of the Breach: What

In Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLP, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit requested supplemental briefs applying Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins to the Article III standing issue at bar. As we previously reported, the Court requested targeted discussion on whether a violation of the statutory right at issue was by

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and Florida have settled charges against Vast Tech Support LLC, OMG Tech Help, their founder and COO Mark Donohue, and related companies regarding claims of deceptive marketing of computer software and tech support services. The settlement continues the FTC’s trend of enforcement actions that target scammers who scare consumers into

In Bishop v. Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A., the defendant debt collectors sent a debt collection letter to the plaintiff’s attorney.  The letter failed to inform the plaintiff that she must dispute the debt “in writing,” as required by § 1692g of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”).  The plaintiff filed suit against

Before the Third Circuit addresses whether a four-second review of a debt collection complaint constitutes “meaningful attorney involvement” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the appellate court will first decide the potential implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.

As we previously reported, Pressler & Pressler