Photo of Julie D. Hoffmeister

Julie is a partner primarily focusing on financial services litigation. She defends consumer-facing companies of all types in individual claims and class actions, including claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Julie also applies her litigation knowledge in assisting businesses in developing compliance processes and procedures for the myriad federal consumer protection laws.

A Texas-based payment processor agreed on November 1 to pay $9 million to settle a putative class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.  According to the plaintiffs, Pivotal Payments, Inc. failed to ensure that a third party it hired to make

The November 3 decision in Alpha Tech Pet, Inc. v. Lagasse, LLC, et al. highlights that one of the key individualized issues present in many TCPA class actions – whether consumers provided their consent to be called, texted, or, as in this case, sent faxes – can defeat class claims.

In its complaint, Alpha

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall recently filed a complaint against Scott’s Credit Repair and its owners, John C. Scott and Krystal Scott, in Montgomery, Alabama Circuit Court.  The complaint alleged that “from beginning to end, the consumer experience with Scott’s Credit Repair is rooted in deception and illegality.”  More specifically, the complaint alleged that the

In Kidd v. Thomson Reuters, plaintiff Lindsay A. Kidd brought a Fair Credit Reporting Act putative class action claim against mass media and information firm Thomson Reuters after she was allegedly denied a job with the Georgia Department of Public Health based on criminal history information obtained by the Department from Thomson Reuters’ subscription-based

Recent attempts by The Häagen-Dazs Shoppe Company, Inc., Nestlé Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company, and Nestlé USA, Inc. to have a Telephone Consumer Protection Act putative class action dismissed proved unsuccessful after the United States District Court for the Northern District of California found that the “thank you” text messages at issue could arguably constitute telemarketing.

Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or the “Bureau”) issued a new rule that will have a significant impact on the payday lending market. The CFPB will now require lenders to conduct a “full-payment test” to determine upfront whether the borrower will have the ability to repay the loan when it becomes due. Lenders

In Ela v. Kathleen Destefano, the Eleventh Circuit recently commented on the remedies provision of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”), holding that the liquidated damages provision does not apply to individual violations of the statute in instances where multiple violations are alleged.

As background, plaintiff Theresa Ann Ela sued Kathleen Destefano, an Orange

On September 20, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Katz v. The Donna Karan Company, LLC, affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act putative class action for failure to establish a concrete injury sufficient to maintain Article III standing to bring suit.

As we previously reported,

Two recent decisions from the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey have expressly disagreed about a credit repair company’s dispute of a debt on behalf of a consumer in two Fair Debt Collection Practices Act cases. 

In Taylor-Burns v. AR Resources, Inc., plaintiff Tonya Taylor-Burns alleged that the debt

A California district court approved a settlement between Prime Marketing Holdings LLC and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, whereby Prime Marketing agreed to pay $150,000 and be banned from offering credit repair services.  The settlement was a result of the CFPB’s September 2016 suit against Prime Marketing for allegedly misleading consumers and charging