The Ninth Circuit upheld a $430,000 jury verdict on a Fair Credit Reporting Act claim related to an auto finance company’s alleged failure to investigate an identity theft claim. The plaintiff, Seungtae Kim, alleged that he suffered damage to his credit and emotional distress as a result of the company’s failure to adequately investigate his
David N. Anthony
David Anthony handles litigation against consumer financial services businesses and other highly regulated companies across the United States. He is a strategic thinker who balances his extensive litigation experience with practical business advice to solve companies’ hardest problems.
Join Us for a Webinar on August 24 – A Review of Recent FCRA Trends and Developments
Join Troutman Sanders attorneys David N. Anthony, Cindy D. Hanson and Meagan A. Mihalko for a timely discussion of recent case studies and case law developments affecting the credit reporting and background screening industry. The discussion will include an update on the effects of Spokeo, as well as an overview of other recent…
Oregon District Court Enters Summary Judgment for Collector in Current Account Balance Case
On August 2, a Federal Court in Oregon entered summary judgment in favor of a collection agency, ruling that a debt collector must disclose to the consumer that interest accrues on an account only when such interest actually does accrue.
In Powers v. Capital Management Services, LP, plaintiff Diane Powers incurred a debt for …
Missouri Appellate Court Affirms Dismissal of FCRA Class Action Based on Application of Spokeo and Federal Standing Rules
On July 25, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed a state trial court’s dismissal of a putative Fair Credit Reporting Act class action against a large retailer based on standing issues. Most notably, the court did so in reliance on Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (May 16, 2016), and Article III …
Defendant Seeks To Stymie Plaintiff’s ‘False Pretense’ Claim Under the FCRA
In Patel v. Comcast Corporation, plaintiff consumer Mounang Patel brought a purported class action lawsuit against defendant Comcast Corporation, arguing that Comcast unlawfully obtains background checks (also referred to as consumer reports) on consumers under false pretenses. On July 17, Comcast moved to dismiss this class claim on the ground that Patel failed …
Indiana Governor Issues Executive Order “Banning the Box”
Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb has issued an executive order “banning the box” for jobs within the executive branch. Effective July 1, applicants for employment in the executive branch will no longer be subject to inquiries about their criminal history at the initial application stage, unless the conviction for a specific crime would …
House Thwarts CFPB’s Arbitration Rule
On July 25, the United States House of Representatives voted to repeal the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s latest arbitration rule.
As we reported previously, the CFPB issued a final rule banning class action waivers in arbitration provisions for covered entities, as well as requiring the covered entities to provide information to the …
District Court Allows FCRA Lawsuit Alleging Debt Collector’s Improper Acquisition of Credit Report to Proceed
A federal district court in Indiana has allowed a plaintiff’s claim that a debt collector improperly accessed her credit report to proceed because the debt collector did not claim the alleged debt arose from a credit transaction in its motion to dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff Vivian Pigg incurred the alleged debt after defaulting on …
Arbitration Rule Compliance Date Set for March 19, 2018
Financial institutions with arbitration clauses in consumer contracts are on the clock. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) new Arbitration Rule was published in the Federal Register today, with an effective date of September 18, 2017 and a compliance date of March 19, 2018. Absent congressional action or successful litigation challenge, those financial institutions…
Seventh Circuit Holds Rule 67 Tender of Full Relief Does Not Moot TCPA Class Action
In Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 136 S.Ct. 663 (2016), the Supreme Court held that an unaccepted offer of full relief under Rule 68 to a named plaintiff was insufficient to moot class claims. However, the Supreme Court expressly left open the possibility of a “different result if a defendant deposits the full amount of …