On August 15, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied a motion for class certification in Legg v. PTZ Insurance Agency, Ltd., a putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Christopher Legg and Page Lozano, sued PTZ and affiliated companies alleging violations
David N. Anthony
David Anthony handles litigation against consumer financial services businesses and other highly regulated companies across the United States. He is a strategic thinker who balances his extensive litigation experience with practical business advice to solve companies’ hardest problems.
Spokeo Update: Ninth Circuit Holds that Plaintiff Adequately Alleged Article III Standing
On August 15, 2017, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision on remand in Spokeo, reversing and remanding the case to the District Court after finding that the named Plaintiff, Thomas Robins, has standing to pursue his claims.
Background
In Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, Plaintiff Robins sued the “people search engine” for alleged violations…
Barclays Hit with Putative Class Action Over Background Checks
On August 4, the Brooklyn Events Center, LLC d/b/a Barclays Center, Levy Premium Foodservice Limited Partnership, and Professional Sports Catering LLC were hit with a putative class action alleging that the businesses use discriminatory criminal history screening policies to deny employment to qualified job applicants.
According to the complaint, the named plaintiff, Felipe …
Northern District of Illinois Rules for Debt Collector on Challenge to 1099-C Language
On August 9, the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judgment to a debt collector who included 1099-C language in its collection letter. The Court held the language was not false or deceptive, and that no reasonable person could read the language otherwise.
In Moses v. LTD Financial Services I, Inc., et al., plaintiff…
Ninth Circuit Upholds $430,000 Jury Verdict in FCRA Case Against Auto Finance Company
The Ninth Circuit upheld a $430,000 jury verdict on a Fair Credit Reporting Act claim related to an auto finance company’s alleged failure to investigate an identity theft claim. The plaintiff, Seungtae Kim, alleged that he suffered damage to his credit and emotional distress as a result of the company’s failure to adequately investigate his …
Join Us for a Webinar on August 24 – A Review of Recent FCRA Trends and Developments
Join Troutman Sanders attorneys David N. Anthony, Cindy D. Hanson and Meagan A. Mihalko for a timely discussion of recent case studies and case law developments affecting the credit reporting and background screening industry. The discussion will include an update on the effects of Spokeo, as well as an overview of other recent…
Oregon District Court Enters Summary Judgment for Collector in Current Account Balance Case
On August 2, a Federal Court in Oregon entered summary judgment in favor of a collection agency, ruling that a debt collector must disclose to the consumer that interest accrues on an account only when such interest actually does accrue.
In Powers v. Capital Management Services, LP, plaintiff Diane Powers incurred a debt for …
Missouri Appellate Court Affirms Dismissal of FCRA Class Action Based on Application of Spokeo and Federal Standing Rules
On July 25, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed a state trial court’s dismissal of a putative Fair Credit Reporting Act class action against a large retailer based on standing issues. Most notably, the court did so in reliance on Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (May 16, 2016), and Article III …
Defendant Seeks To Stymie Plaintiff’s ‘False Pretense’ Claim Under the FCRA
In Patel v. Comcast Corporation, plaintiff consumer Mounang Patel brought a purported class action lawsuit against defendant Comcast Corporation, arguing that Comcast unlawfully obtains background checks (also referred to as consumer reports) on consumers under false pretenses. On July 17, Comcast moved to dismiss this class claim on the ground that Patel failed …
Indiana Governor Issues Executive Order “Banning the Box”
Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb has issued an executive order “banning the box” for jobs within the executive branch. Effective July 1, applicants for employment in the executive branch will no longer be subject to inquiries about their criminal history at the initial application stage, unless the conviction for a specific crime would …