In Sweet v. LinkedIn Corporation, a number of job applicants sued the social networking service for alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act based on LinkedIn’s “Reference Search” function. The Court dismissed the complaint at the pleadings stage, holding that the reports were not “consumer reports” and that LinkedIn was not a “consumer
Class Action Lawsuits Challenging FCRA Disclosure Forms Get Multi-District Treatment
On April 9, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered that three putative nationwide class actions against Michaels Stores Inc. be centralized in New Jersey. The actions accuse Michaels Stores of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) by failing to properly notify job applicants that the company would access their credit reports.
Federal
CFPB Managing Regulatory Counsel Provides Update on Debt Collection Rulemaking
On April 17, Tom Pahl, managing regulatory counsel for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Office of Regulations, spoke at ACA International’s Washington Insights Conference about the CFPB’s debt collection rulemaking. According to Pahl, the CFPB currently is focusing on four debt collection related topics for its proposed rulemaking:
- Communication issues;
- Data integrity and information issues;
Missouri Judge Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Debt Collector
On April 13, Judge Beth Phillips, a federal judge in the Western District of Missouri, granted summary judgment in favor of Credit World Services, Inc. (“CWS”) in a case filed by a consumer that owed a debt to CWS (full opinion found here). In the lawsuit, Plaintiff alleges that CWS violated the Fair
WVCCPA Amendments Signed into Law by Governor Tomblin
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015, Governor Tomblin signed into law Senate Bill No. 542 amending several sections of the West Virginia Consumer Credit Protection Act (WVCCPA). The bill will be effective on June 12, 2015, however, certain provisions of the bill become applicable only to actions filed after September 1, 2015. The amendments will have
FTC Settles With Two Debt Sellers Requiring Them to Strengthen Security Protocols
After alleging in two separate cases that two debt portfolio brokers – Cornerstone and Co. LLC and Bayview Solutions LLC – were exposing too much personal information about consumer-debtors, the Federal Trade Commission announced that the parties have reached final settlements.
Specifically, in the cases of Federal Trade Commission v. Cornerstone and Company, LLC, et
Yonkers Enacts New Debt Collection Requirements
The city of Yonkers, New York, enacted General Ordinance No. 16-2014 to amend its Consumer Protection Code (“Code”) by adding new requirements for debt buyers and collection agencies. The revised Code includes the following sections: definitions, license requirements, required collection practices, prohibited collection practices, and penalties for non-compliance. The new Code requirements became effective on
Food Lion Parent Settles $3 Million Background Check Class Action
On March 2, a class of job applicants requested that the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina approve a nearly $3 million settlement they had reached with Delhaize America LLC, Food Lion LLC’s parent company. The applicants had sued Delhaize – which owns Food Lion, Hannaford, and Bottom Dollar – for
Class Action FCRA Lawsuit Challenging Whole Foods’ Employment Background Screening Disclosure Form Survives Motion to Dismiss
On March 30, a Florida federal judge refused to dismiss a proposed class action accusing Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act with its employee background check notification methods, ruling the suit alleged Whole Foods’ liability release was included in a disclosure document. As we previously reported in December, Whole
District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss FCRA Challenge to Defendant’s Background Screening Disclosure Form
A federal district court in the Northern District of California recently dismissed a lawsuit filed against Paramount Pictures Corporation challenging its alleged failure to provide job applicants with a background check disclosure form that “consisted solely of the disclosure,” as required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). Specifically, in addition to making the disclosure