Photo of David M. Gettings

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and associated FCC regulations, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and many similar state consumer protection statutes.

On August 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action against TransUnion on the basis that it failed to allege a plausible claim for relief, holding that TransUnion was not objectively unreasonable in its reading of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The plaintiff, Kathleen

In Kent v. TransUnion, plaintiff Rowdy Kent sued multiple consumer reporting agencies and the United States Defense Finance and Accounting Services for alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.  DFAS moved to dismiss Kent’s claims, arguing that it possesses sovereign immunity from claims under the FCRA.  On August 25, the District Court for

Countering a nationwide trend of “ban the box” ordinances that prohibit employers from asking about an individual’s criminal history at the initial application stage, Indiana has become the first state to ensure through legislation that employers can inquire into applicants’ criminal histories.  The legislation prohibits localities from implementing “ban the box” ordinances.  The measure has

The recent matter of Nesbitt, et al. v. Postmates Inc., Case No. CGC15547146 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, demonstrates the continuing trend of litigation regarding the content of background disclosure forms, as well as ongoing issues regarding the failure of employers to provide notice of adverse

In Patel v. Comcast Corporation, plaintiff consumer Mounang Patel brought a purported class action lawsuit against defendant Comcast Corporation, arguing that Comcast unlawfully obtains background checks (also referred to as consumer reports) on consumers under false pretenses.  On July 17, Comcast moved to dismiss this class claim on the ground that Patel failed

Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb has issued an executive order “banning the box” for jobs within the executive branch.  Effective July 1, applicants for employment in the executive branch will no longer be subject to inquiries about their criminal history at the initial application stage, unless the conviction for a specific crime would

Financial institutions with arbitration clauses in consumer contracts are on the clock. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) new Arbitration Rule was published in the Federal Register today, with an effective date of September 18, 2017 and a compliance date of March 19, 2018. Absent congressional action or successful litigation challenge, those financial institutions

On July 10, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued its long-awaited final rule banning class action waivers in arbitration provisions for covered entities, as well as requiring the covered entities to provide information to the CFPB regarding any efforts to compel arbitration. This rule is of significance to any financial services company that utilizes

A new Florida federal district court case is yet another reminder of the minefield of federal and state regulations governing employer criminal background check forms.  In Graham v. Pyramid Healthcare Solutions, the Court certified a class action against the employer under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and ruled that whether the employer willfully

On June 27, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced approximately $2 million in fines and penalties against four credit repair companies and three associated individuals for allegedly misleading consumers and charging improper fees.  Under two proposed final judgments that the CFPB filed in United States District Court for the Central District of California,