The Ninth Circuit upheld a $430,000 jury verdict on a Fair Credit Reporting Act claim related to an auto finance company’s alleged failure to investigate an identity theft claim. The plaintiff, Seungtae Kim, alleged that he suffered damage to his credit and emotional distress as a result of the company’s failure to adequately investigate his
Join Us for a Webinar on August 24 – A Review of Recent FCRA Trends and Developments
Join Troutman Sanders attorneys David N. Anthony, Cindy D. Hanson and Meagan A. Mihalko for a timely discussion of recent case studies and case law developments affecting the credit reporting and background screening industry. The discussion will include an update on the effects of Spokeo, as well as an overview of other recent
District Court Allows FCRA Lawsuit Alleging Debt Collector’s Improper Acquisition of Credit Report to Proceed
A federal district court in Indiana has allowed a plaintiff’s claim that a debt collector improperly accessed her credit report to proceed because the debt collector did not claim the alleged debt arose from a credit transaction in its motion to dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff Vivian Pigg incurred the alleged debt after defaulting on
Arbitration Rule Compliance Date Set for March 19, 2018
Financial institutions with arbitration clauses in consumer contracts are on the clock. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) new Arbitration Rule was published in the Federal Register today, with an effective date of September 18, 2017 and a compliance date of March 19, 2018. Absent congressional action or successful litigation challenge, those financial institutions
CFPB Issues Rule Banning Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Provisions
On July 10, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued its long-awaited final rule banning class action waivers in arbitration provisions for covered entities, as well as requiring the covered entities to provide information to the CFPB regarding any efforts to compel arbitration. This rule is of significance to any financial services company that utilizes
Cheesecake Factory Tries to Dismiss Putative FACTA Class Action on Spokeo Grounds
The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc. recently asked a New York federal district judge to dismiss a putative Fair and Accurate Transactions Act putative class action that accuses the restaurant chain of printing too many credit card numbers on consumers’ receipts. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Cheesecake Factory argues that the class
CFPB Targets Credit Repair Companies and Their Principals for Allegedly Misleading Consumers and Charging Improper Fees
On June 27, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced approximately $2 million in fines and penalties against four credit repair companies and three associated individuals for allegedly misleading consumers and charging improper fees. Under two proposed final judgments that the CFPB filed in United States District Court for the Central District of California,
USPS’ Motion to Dismiss Putative FCRA Class Action Denied by Wisconsin Magistrate Judge
A Wisconsin federal magistrate judge denied the United States Postal Services’ attempt to dismiss a Fair Credit Reporting Act putative class action, holding that the plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently alleged an injury-in-fact.
According to the complaint, plaintiff Rondo Tyus applied for a security clearance to work at the USPS. The USPS obtained a criminal background report,
Supreme Court Declines to Weigh in on Spokeo in FACTA Lawsuit
The United States Supreme Court has denied a petition seeking review of a Seventh Circuit decision holding that a consumer lacked Article III standing to challenge an alleged violation of the Fair and Accurate Transactions Act where the defendant retailer printed more than the last five digits of his credit card number and the expiration
J. Crew Beats FACTA Class Action on Spokeo Grounds
On June 6, a federal judge in New Jersey for the second time dismissed a putative class action against clothier J. Crew Group, Inc. on the grounds that the plaintiff, Ahmed Kamal, had not pled a concrete injury sufficient for Article III standing light of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins. Kamal alleged that J. Crew violated