The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania recently held that a pro se plaintiff failed to plead facts sufficient to demonstrate that an agency relationship existed. This holding reinforced the need for specificity in Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims that allege vicarious liability.
In Robert D. Kline v. Elite Medical Laboratories
Furthering his state’s historic consumer protections against surprise medical bills, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law this past October the Patient Protection Act, adding additional protections for emergency room visits.
New York was already a bellwether in the field, passing the historic Surprise Medical Bill Act in 2014 to prevent unexpected medical bills
Here’s the problem: In the managed care litigation space, noncontracted medical providers are suing payors as part of their business-collections strategy, utilizing quasi-contract theories of recovery in their attempt to justify ever growing bills.
In the traditional contracted-provider/ payor relationship, the network agreement, of course, governs rates of reimbursement. Medical providers are turning to quasi-contract
Troutman Sanders attorneys David Anthony, Virginia Flynn, Alan Wingfield, and Chad Fuller will be hosting a Webinar titled, “A Glimmer of Light: An Update on Key TCPA Developments” on November 19th, 2019 from 3:00pm – 4:00pm EST.
The webinar will be discussing recent opinions from various courts around the country on key
A California district court issued a ruling in a debt collection-related Telephone Consumer Protection Act case that clarifies whether a debtor with multiple accounts revokes consent for all of those accounts when speaking to a creditor or collector about just one of the accounts.
The case, Henry Mendoza v. Allied Interstate LLC, et al.,
In a non-precedential ruling, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a district court decision to grant summary judgment in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
The plaintiffs – a condominium owner and his children – lapsed on payments owed to a condominium agency,
It is common knowledge that class action lawsuits are expensive. And we know that many consumer class action lawsuits are filed without a proper class representative or with a class that is otherwise ill-defined, legally deficient, or unascertainable. Other purported Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action lawsuits present potentially dispositive issues from the outset, such
Virginia Bell Flynn is featured in Law360 for receiving a 2019 Rising Star Award in Consumer Protection. According to the article, which can be accessed online here, Flynn “has successfully represented health care companies in cases involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and has advised major settlements for her clients, such as representing Anthem
CVS Pharmacy has agreed to pay $15 million to settle long-running claims asserted by a nationwide class of consumers who allegedly received unsolicited flu shot reminder calls. The parties filed a motion for preliminary approval of the class settlement this week in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
The underlying
On July 24, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed new, comprehensive robocall reform. Passed by a vote of 429-3, the Stopping Bad Robocalls Act (“SBRA”) would give the Federal Communications Commission novel methods to enforce existing anti-robocall laws in addition to allowing the FCC to go after violators more strictly. Beyond giving the FCC the