Photo of David N. Anthony

David Anthony handles litigation against consumer financial services businesses and other highly regulated companies across the United States. He is a strategic thinker who balances his extensive litigation experience with practical business advice to solve companies’ hardest problems.

We are pleased to announce that Troutman Sanders partner David Anthony will be a featured speaker at the Richmond Bar Association CLE presentation titled “Class Actions 101: The Rules, Certification, Settlement, and the Court” on Tuesday, May 24 from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. 

The speakers will cover the important “nuts and bolts” of the

In Ritchie v. Northern Leasing Systems, Plaintiff alleged twelve “myriad causes of action” ranging from civil RICO claims to federal fair credit statutes arising from Plaintiff’s lease of certain business equipment from Defendants.  Plaintiff Patricia Ritchie applied for credit card processing services and a credit card machine for her business through a company called

The New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL”) prohibits discrimination in employment, public accommodations, and housing.  It also prohibits discriminatory harassment and bias-based profiling by law enforcement.  The NYCHRL, pursuant to the 2005 Civil Rights Restoration Act, must be construed “independently from similar or identical provisions of New York state or federal statutes” such

On April 7, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the government’s motion for summary judgment against a Texas-based third party debt collector, Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc. (“CRS”) and its president, Timothy Ford.

As previously reported, the Department of Justice, on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission, filed a

In Leyse v. LifeTime Entertainment Services LLC, the district court for the Southern District of New York recently granted a defendant’s motion to enter judgment on behalf of the plaintiff upon tender to the Clerk of Court of all offered monetary damages and costs.

Plaintiff Mark Leyse brought a putative class action suit against

On April 6, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment in a case involving both Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) claims and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) claims.

In McCaskill v. Navient Solutions, Inc., Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc., a student loan

On March 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a district court’s dismissal of a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) complaint, finding instead that the plaintiffs had adequately stated a claim for relief under Section 1692e of the FDCPA.

In Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC, Plaintiffs both

The Sixth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s decision that the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s statute of limitations commences upon the discovery of facts giving rise to a violation in Rocheleau v. Elder Living Construction, LLC.    

In the underlying suit, Plaintiff Richard Rocheleau alleged that Defendants Elder Living Construction, LLC and First Advantage LSN

Judge Beth Labson Freeman for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently joined numerous other courts across the country in staying a putative FCRA class action pending the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins.

The underlying action in the California court challenged the defendant’s

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently issued its annual Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) report, which provides a comprehensive overview of both the CFPB’s and Federal Trade Commission’s enforcement efforts throughout 2015.  The report specifically provides a background of the debt collection market, an overview of consumer complaints, a description of the CFPB’s