Photo of David M. Gettings

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and associated FCC regulations, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and many similar state consumer protection statutes.

Last week, the Office of the Solicitor General urged the U.S. Supreme Court via amicus brief to deny Spokeo Inc.’s appeal of a Ninth Circuit decision that revived a Virginia man’s proposed class action accusing the “people search engine” of publishing false information about him.

The Solicitor General said Spokeo’s petition for a writ of

On December 2, 2014, in Stein v. Buccaneers Ltd. P’ship, No. 13-15417, — F.3d –, 2014 WL 6734819 (11th Cir. 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court order dismissing a putative class action as moot, holding that: (1) an unaccepted Rule 68 offer of judgment does not

On March 11, 2015, a district court in the Eastern District of Virginia denied an employer’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Credit Reporting Act case dealing with the inclusion of release language in a background check disclosure.  Employers should review this decision carefully as the case law on this issue develops further.

In

On March 2, the plaintiff’s counsel in Brown v. Delhaize America, LLC submitted an unopposed motion for preliminary approval, seeking Court approval of another Fair Credit Reporting Act class action settlement.  Employers should treat this settlement as another reminder to verify their compliance with the FCRA.

According to the parties’ settlement paperwork, the Brown

On March 5, a judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected a plaintiff’s proposal to notify proposed class members of a Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuit filed by a group of former interns against Gawker via various social media platforms, including Reddit and Tumblr pages, LinkedIn, and

Use of criminal background checks requires compliance with the technical requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act  and has spawned a large number of class actions and individual claims under the FCRA.  However, use of background checks has also been under siege by the states and localities that have been enacting “ban the box” requirements

In a class action settlement that was recently granted final approval, Publix Super Markets Inc. agreed to pay nearly $6.8 million in a class action lawsuit settlement over background checks under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Plaintiff, Erin Knights, applied for a job with Publix in early 2013 through an electronic kiosk.  The lawsuit alleges

On February 6, Uber filed a motion to compel individual arbitration of a class action lawsuit under the Fair Credit Reporting Act related to its alleged background check practices.  If Uber is successful in compelling arbitration, it will provide another example of the value of arbitration agreements in the face of litigation.

In Mohamed v.

On February 11, a federal court in Texas dismissed a putative Fair Credit Reporting Act class action filed by a former patient of health services provider St. Joseph Services Corp. who alleged that the defendant’s failure to guard against a personal data breach violated the FCRA.  After reviewing the state of the law regarding standing

Last week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Continental Finance Company LLC, a credit card lender, to refund an estimated $2.7 million to approximately 98,000 consumers.  The CFPB found that the company’s subprime credit cards misrepresented certain fees and hit consumers with illegal charges.  The order also requires the company to pay a civil penalty