A recent federal court decision granting summary judgment to a plaintiff on a claim that a lender violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., by failing to conduct a “reasonable” investigation of a credit reporting dispute – an issue normally reserved for a jury – illustrates the difficulty
Carter Nichols
Carter is an associate in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice. His practice focuses on consumer protection statutes and complex litigation, including claims arising under Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Fair Debt Collection Protection Act (FDCPA), and Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
Court Finds Terrason Spinks and Jet Processing Liable for $281M IWorks Scheme
On August 18, following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Nevada found defendants Terrason Spinks and his company, Jet Processing, Inc., jointly and severally liable for $280,911,870 in consumer injury caused by violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”) and Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”). This case…
FTC and Debt Collector Agree to Defendant Leaving Debt Collection Practice
On August 24, the United States District Court for the Western District of New York entered a Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment against the last of a group of defendants who engaged in banned debt collection practices. The defendant, Anthony Coppola, is now barred from debt collection activities, misrepresenting material facts of…
FTC Charges Deceptive Debt Collectors in Intimidation Scheme; Court Enters Temporary Restraining Order
On August 21, the Federal Trade Commission charged a North Carolina debt collection operation with using deception and intimidation to collect money from consumers for debts they did not owe or that the group had no right to collect. On August 24, the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina granted a temporary…
Central District of California Limits Fees in FCRA Class Action, Creates Bigger Award Pool for Class Members
On July 18, the District Court for the Central District of California granted in part and denied in part a motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and other payments in a Fair Credit Reporting Act class action suit. The motion accompanied a proposed $400,000 settlement, with a third of the funds allocated to class counsel for…