On March 16, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a compliance bulletin entitled Unfair Billing and Collection Practices After Bankruptcy Discharges of Certain Student Loan Debts. The compliance bulletin focused on the treatment of certain private student loans following a bankruptcy discharge. It’s also another example of the CFPB’s efforts to expand bankruptcy relief for student loans.

Under the Bankruptcy Code and applicable rules, in order to secure a discharge of “qualified education loans” in bankruptcy, borrowers must bring an adversary proceeding and demonstrate that the loans constitute an undue hardship. For a number of years, federal courts have been split on whether non-qualified private education loans are also subject to the undue hardship standard in the Bankruptcy Code. The CFPB’s Bulletin weighs in on this split of authority among federal courts on this issue in favor of greater availability of discharge for certain types of private student loans.

According to the CFPB, its examiners identified servicers that did not determine whether private education loans were qualified or non-qualified and, thus, improperly returned non-qualified education loans to repayment after discharge. The CFPB states that it directed these servicers to cease collection of the discharged loans and take remedial action, including conducting a multi-year lookback and issuing refunds to affected consumers.

Key findings from the compliance bulletin include:

  • According to the CFPB, examiners found that certain student loan servicers failed to maintain policies or procedures for distinguishing between loans that are discharged in the regular course of a bankruptcy proceeding and loans that require borrowers to initiate an adversary proceeding and meet the “undue hardship” standard.
  • Consequently, examiners identified instances where servicers resumed collecting on loans that had been discharged.
  • In these instances, CFPB examiners observed that most borrowers resumed payments, sometimes paying thousands of dollars on discharged debts.

Going forward, the CFPB stated it will focus on whether servicers: 1) continue to collect on loans that are discharged; 2) have adequate policies and procedures to identify the different types of loans; and 3) provide accurate information to borrowers about the status of their loans and available bankruptcy protections.

Notably, as discussed here, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released guidance to its attorneys regarding requests to discharge student loans in bankruptcy cases. The guidance developed in coordination with the Department of Education (DOE) advises DOJ attorneys to “recommend to the court that a debtor’s student loan be discharged if three conditions are satisfied: 1) the debtor presently lacks an ability to repay the loan; 2) the debtor’s inability to pay the loan is likely to persist in the future; and 3) the debtor has acted in good faith in the past in attempting to repay the loan.” We view this guidance as a further effort to promote the discharge of student loans in bankruptcy, but it remains to be seen whether courts will accept the standard set forth by the DOJ as being consistent with the “undue hardship” language in the Bankruptcy Code.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Andrew Buxbaum Andrew Buxbaum

Andrew Buxbaum is Counsel in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice. Andrew provides clients with valuable strategy and analysis based on his vast experience in both private practice and in-house counsel positions. Andrew specializes in representing clients in the financial services industry (including…

Andrew Buxbaum is Counsel in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice. Andrew provides clients with valuable strategy and analysis based on his vast experience in both private practice and in-house counsel positions. Andrew specializes in representing clients in the financial services industry (including banks, lenders, mortgage companies, debt collection firms and loan servicers) in consumer litigation, bankruptcy, and regulatory compliance matters.

Photo of Stefanie Jackman Stefanie Jackman

Stefanie takes a holistic approach to working with clients both through compliance counseling and assessment relating to consumer products and services, as well as serving as a zealous advocate in government inquiries, investigations, and consumer litigation.

Photo of James Kim James Kim

As a former senior enforcement attorney with the CFPB, James provides the industry knowledge and expertise that fintechs and financial institutions require when launching new products or facing regulatory scrutiny.

Photo of Deborah Kovsky-Apap Deborah Kovsky-Apap

Deborah provides clients with practical advice on bankruptcy, out-of-court workouts, and distressed M&A transactions, in addition to possessing substantial litigation and trial experience in the areas of insolvency and commercial law.

Photo of Caleb Rosenberg Caleb Rosenberg

Caleb is an associate in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group. He focuses his practice on helping federal and state-chartered banks, fintech companies, finance companies, and licensed lenders navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and…

Caleb is an associate in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group. He focuses his practice on helping federal and state-chartered banks, fintech companies, finance companies, and licensed lenders navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small businesses in the credit and alternative finance products industry.

Photo of Chris Willis Chris Willis

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending…

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending them in individual and class action lawsuits brought by consumers and enforcement actions brought by government agencies.