In Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC, Judge Bashant, a district court judge for the Southern District of California, found that the FCC lacks the authority to change the statutory definition of “automated telephone dialing system” (“ATDS”) under the TCPA. Judge Bashant determined that the FCC only has rulemaking authority over sections 227(b) and
Fourth Circuit Rules Debt Collector Violated “Call Charged” Section of TCPA for Using an ATDS to Call a Residential Landline
Earlier this month, the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion holding a debt collector’s autodialed calls to a residential landline with VoIP service violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act due to the fact that the consumer was charged for each call.
In Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc., No. 13-2358, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS
The Second Circuit’s Ruling in Nigro v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau Narrows Express Consent Under the TCPA
On October 16, the Second Circuit in Nigro v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC, ruled against a debt collector by holding that the agency violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act when it repeatedly called the plaintiff about his deceased mother-in-law’s debt. Despite the plaintiff providing the number called to the creditor, the Court of Appeals
The TCPA Balance Shifts: The Eleventh Circuit Decision in Mais is Extremely Favorable for Collectors
On September 29, the Eleventh Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., overturning the district court’s prior holding and providing defense-favorable law on prior express consent. The decision was in response to an unprecedented May 2013 ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Plaintiffs Alleging TCPA and FDCPA Claims May Be Able to Circumvent Arbitration Where Calls Were Intended for an Unrelated Third Party
In Porter v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122865, a Northern District of California court denied the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration based on the plaintiff’s allegation that the debt collection calls at issue were intended for a third party, and thus were not related to the contract containing the arbitration
Contracting and Text Sending is Sufficient for Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction in TCPA Class Action
In Payton v. Kale Realty, LLC, plaintiff Payton filed an amended complaint, asserting that defendant Kale used newly added defendant Voiceshot’s services to send unsolicited advertisements to potential customers’ cell phones. Voiceshot provides web-based cloud telecommunication services by which users can send mass text messages for a fee. Voiceshot is a Delaware company with
Is Your Smartphone an ATDS? The United States Says “No”.
TCPA litigation is running rampant in courts throughout the country. Automatic telephone dialing systems, or “ATDSs” or “autodialers”, are at the heart of virtually every TCPA case involving cell phones. Why? Because if a call to a person’s cell phone was not made with an ATDS as defined by the statute, there is virtually no
FCC Strengthens Consent Requirements by Limiting Scope Based upon Individual’s Expectations
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in late June 2014 responded to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ request in Nigro v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau for the FCC to opine on a specific question. The Second Circuit asked whether prior express consent existed under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for an individual’s provision of a
ACA International’s 75th Annual Convention & Expo
Celebrate the industry’s past, present and future while enjoying dazzling Chicago. Featuring a dynamic line-up of engaging speakers including Karl Rove and Ken Schmidt, exciting musical guests KC and The Sunshine Band, 40+ innovative educational sessions and a jam-packed Expo Hall, this is a must-attend event. There’s still time to register, so make plans to
9th Circuit Adopts FCC Opinion and Opens Door for Vicarious Liability Claims Under TCPA
In a novel ruling, the Ninth Circuit expressly adopted an opinion from the Federal Communications Commission, finding the potential for vicarious liability under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. In Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp., No. 12-56458 (unpublished), the Ninth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s holding that Taco Bell was not vicariously liable under the