Alan D. Wingfield

Subscribe to Alan D. Wingfield's Posts

Democrats and Republicans in Congress can rarely reach agreement on anything these days, but one bipartisan effort that continues to gain steam is their repeated attempts to learn the methodology by which the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) and other federal regulators investigate auto lenders for purported fair lending violations.  In a letter dated March…

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has sent a detailed letter, dated February 12, 2004, addressed to Director Cordray of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) in which it expresses its disapproval of the CFPB’s approach of “regulation by enforcement settlement combined with issuance of brief guidance statements” in lieu of utilizing a formal rulemaking process…

The National Association of Automobile Dealers (NADA) issued a comprehensive manual in late January that includes detailed recommendations to dealers related to dealer reserve and fair lending compliance, in an attempt to assist members with compliance with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) bulletin addressing indirect auto lending and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).…

Troutman Sanders’ lawyers, Alan Wingfield and Paige Fitzgerald, will be attending the upcoming NADC Annual Meeting in Palm Beach, FL. NADC’s 10th Annual Member Conference will be held April 27-29, 2014 at the Four Seasons Resort in Palm Beach, Florida. The two day program will provide innovative ideas and valuable insight to meet the…

Following up its settlement with two automotive dealers in September 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has continued its nationwide targeting of misrepresentations made in print, Internet and video advertisements that relate to the sale, financing and leasing of motor vehicles. The FTC alleged that these dealers’ advertisements falsely led consumers to believe they could…

On December 23, 2013, a large credit card company was ordered by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and other federal agencies to pay $75 million in restitution and penalties based on allegations of a variety of illegal practices, including unfair billing and deceptive marketing of add-on products. The CFPB alleged that the company misled

…

Few U.S. Supreme Court consumer protection cases over the past year were as closely watched and anxiously anticipated as Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. Scheduled for oral argument on December 4, with a decision anticipated sometime in mid-2014, the housing discrimination case drew attention from cautious onlookers from many…