On February 14, Patrice Ficklin, the Fair Lending Director for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), together with senior officials from the Federal Reserve Board, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Finance Agency, and U.S. Department of Justice sent a joint letter to The Appraisal Foundation (TAF), the private organization that sets appraisal standards, urging it to revise the fourth draft of its 2023 Edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP or Uniform Standards) to include a detailed statement of federal prohibitions against discrimination. Specifically, the agencies requested that TAF include in its Uniform Standards the nondiscrimination standards under the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act rather than the current summary of the distinctions between “unethical discrimination” and “unlawful discrimination.” This is the second letter that federal officials have sent TAF raising concerns with the Uniform Standards.

In the blog accompanying release of the joint letter, the CFPB explained the impetus for the letter. “For more than 50 years, federal law has forbidden racial, religious, and other discrimination in home appraisals. It is imperative that TAF provide appraisers clear, detailed, and unambiguous warnings about the requirements of federal law covering appraisal standards. [TAF], however, appears reluctant to act. Its recalcitrance undermines efforts to rid the housing market of bias and discrimination and threatens the market’s fairness and competitiveness.”

As discussed here, combatting appraisal bias continues to be a top priority for the CFPB and other federal regulators. The agencies have been actively working with the White House Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) Interagency Task Force and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Appraisal Subcommittee to address the issue of appraisal bias, and the CFPB is engaged in a project to develop regulations for automated valuation models to prevent algorithmic bias in home valuations. The CFPB has also warned that lenders that fail to ensure borrowers can seek a reconsideration of their home valuation risk violating federal law. This joint agency letter and accompanying blog post only serve to underline the seriousness with which the regulators take the issue of appraisal bias.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Chris Willis Chris Willis

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending…

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending them in individual and class action lawsuits brought by consumers and enforcement actions brought by government agencies.

Photo of Lori Sommerfield Lori Sommerfield

With over two decades of consumer financial services experience in federal government, in-house, and private practice settings, and a specialty in fair lending regulatory compliance, Lori counsels clients in supervisory issues, examinations, investigations, and enforcement actions.

Photo of Mark Furletti Mark Furletti

Mark helps clients navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small business, particularly in connection with credit, deposit, and payments products. He is a trusted advisor, providing practical legal counsel and advice to providers of financial

Mark helps clients navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small business, particularly in connection with credit, deposit, and payments products. He is a trusted advisor, providing practical legal counsel and advice to providers of financial services across numerous industries.

Photo of Christine Emello Christine Emello

Christine focuses her practice on consumer financial services matters, with an emphasis on disputes, litigation, investigations, and examinations. She has worked on both federal and state court cases in jurisdictions across the U.S. Christine drafts pleadings, including complaints, motions, and responses, and prepares…

Christine focuses her practice on consumer financial services matters, with an emphasis on disputes, litigation, investigations, and examinations. She has worked on both federal and state court cases in jurisdictions across the U.S. Christine drafts pleadings, including complaints, motions, and responses, and prepares witnesses for cases involving state and federal laws such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). She has worked on cases for a variety of financial institutions, banks, and lenders, including a large multinational bank, a major national health care consulting firm, and a leading worldwide online payments platform.