In a joint statement, four federal agencies in consultation with state bank regulators clarified that as a result of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (“2018 Farm Bill”), banks no longer are required to file a Suspicious Activity Report (“SAR”) on customers “solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp.”

The 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act and directed the United States Department of Agriculture to regulate its production. This fall, the USDA released an interim final rule establishing a regulatory program that will facilitate the domestic cultivation of hemp. Under the interim final rule: (1) hemp may be grown only with a valid USDA-issued license, or under a USDA-approved state or tribal plan; (2) a state or tribal government may prohibit the production of hemp despite its legal status under federal law; and (3) marijuana remains a controlled substance under federal law.

Since hemp no longer is classified as a controlled substance, banks are now expected to follow standard SAR procedures for hemp-related customers. Accordingly, banks should file a SAR “if indicia of suspicious activity warrants,” but not solely because a customer engages in the growth or cultivation of hemp.

The joint statement goes on to note that customers engaged in hemp-related businesses are responsible for compliance with the interim rule, and banks must have a compliance program “commensurate with the level of complexity and risks involved.” Specifically, banks must ensure compliance with applicable regulatory requirements for customer identification, suspicious activity reporting, currency transaction reporting, and risk-based customer due diligence, including the collection of beneficial ownership information for legal entity customers.

In the context of marijuana-related businesses, banks are to continue following the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s guidance FIN-2014-G001 – BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses. FinCEN will issue additional guidance after further review and evaluation of the USDA’s interim final rule.


Our Cannabis Practice provides advice on issues related to applicable state law. Cannabis remains an illegal controlled substance under federal law.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dascher Pasco Dascher Pasco

Dascher is an attorney within the Regulatory Investigations, Strategy, and Enforcement practice, based in the Richmond office. She joined our firm after working in personal injury and medical malpractice for a Virginia trial law firm. Dascher brings varied legal experience to the firm…

Dascher is an attorney within the Regulatory Investigations, Strategy, and Enforcement practice, based in the Richmond office. She joined our firm after working in personal injury and medical malpractice for a Virginia trial law firm. Dascher brings varied legal experience to the firm with strong litigation and regulatory strategy capabilities.

Photo of Agustin Rodriguez Agustin Rodriguez

Agustin is sought after by clients for his strategic counsel on their most challenging competitive and regulatory compliance issues, including tobacco Master Settlement Agreement issues, federal and state enforcement investigations, licensing and excise tax issues, developing compliance programs, and evaluating advertising and marketing…

Agustin is sought after by clients for his strategic counsel on their most challenging competitive and regulatory compliance issues, including tobacco Master Settlement Agreement issues, federal and state enforcement investigations, licensing and excise tax issues, developing compliance programs, and evaluating advertising and marketing practices. A partner in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group as well as its Tobacco and Cannabis law practices, he represents manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and suppliers in all aspects of their businesses, including regulatory compliance, FDA requirements, administrative disputes involving federal or state governmental entities, mergers and acquisitions, commercial agreements, and taxation matters.