Counsel for the National Association of Convenience Stores, the National Retail Federation, and the Food Marketing Institute, among other retailers, indicated this week that they will file a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court for review of a March 2014 D.C. Circuit decision involving debit card “swipe fees.”

In 2011, the Federal Reserve finalized debt card interchange fee rules – a task assigned to it under the Dodd-Frank Act – that included the Durbin amendment, a rule aimed to boost competition in the debt card transaction market with lower swipe fees for merchants. Ultimately, the Federal Reserve set a final cap on fees of 21 cents per transaction after significant lobbying efforts by major credit card companies.  Many small-transaction retailers, however, complained that the final rule and higher transaction fees would disproportionately affect their businesses.

Those retailers later filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and obtained a favorable decision from District Judge Richard J. Leon, who vacated the Durbin amendment.  On appeal, the D.C. Circuit overturned that decision, finding that the Federal Reserve had appropriately determined the costs that issuers could included when setting their fees. The appellate court concluded that Congress had empowered the Fed to draft the debit card interchange fee rules and determine the best possible manner to implement them.

Now, the retailers will seek Supreme Court review of that decision.  They have filed a motion for an extension of time until July 21, 2014 to file their cert petition.  If denied, their petition will be due on June 19.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of H. Scott Kelly H. Scott Kelly

Scott is a consumer data and privacy specialist. He regularly defends against data breach lawsuits and class action claims asserted under federal and state consumer-protection statutes (FCRA, FDCPA, TCPA, UCC, UDAAP, RICO). Scott represents companies on an array of data privacy issues, including

Scott is a consumer data and privacy specialist. He regularly defends against data breach lawsuits and class action claims asserted under federal and state consumer-protection statutes (FCRA, FDCPA, TCPA, UCC, UDAAP, RICO). Scott represents companies on an array of data privacy issues, including background screening, consumer reporting, data breaches, ransomware attacks, and related regulatory investigations by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and state attorneys general.

Photo of Michael E. Lacy Michael E. Lacy

Michael heads the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice, and handles class actions and high-stakes consumer litigation on a nationwide basis. He represents banks, mortgage servicers, debt buyers and collectors, and lenders against claims under consumer protection statutes, including the FCRA, TCPA, RESPA, RICO,

Michael heads the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice, and handles class actions and high-stakes consumer litigation on a nationwide basis. He represents banks, mortgage servicers, debt buyers and collectors, and lenders against claims under consumer protection statutes, including the FCRA, TCPA, RESPA, RICO, and state UDAP laws. He has significant experience litigating and trying corporate governance disputes, including shareholder derivative claims, corporate dissolution cases, and corporate divorce matters. Michael also represents public utility companies in litigation and regulatory matters, including condemnation and land use cases.