In Telephone Science Corporation v. Asset Recovery Solutions, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently held that Telephone Science Corporation (“TSC”), a telecommunications company, did not have standing to pursue its Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims against Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC (“ARS”), a debt collection company.

TSC operates a service called “Nomorobo” designed to help consumers avoid incoming robocalls.  In addition to providing this service to consumers, TSC also maintains a “honeypot” group of telephone numbers from which TSC is able to gather information related to inbound calls.  The “honeypot” is comprised of thousands of telephone numbers to which TSC subscribes.  According to TSC, ARS began calling telephone numbers in the TSC honeypot using a predictive dialer.  Between March 2014 and February 2016, ARS allegedly placed more than 12,000 robocalls to these numbers.  TSC filed suit against ARS in June 2015 under the TCPA.

In August 2016, the Court granted ARS’ motion to dismiss, finding that TSC’s Second Amended Complaint failed to satisfy the “zone-of-interests” test under the TCPA and, accordingly, TSC lacked statutory standing to pursue its claims.  The Court concluded that “the sole reason TSC subscribes to ‘thousands’ of honeypot numbers is to gather a ‘large quantity of data.’”  The calls were therefore not “unwanted and unwelcome.”

TSC subsequently moved to alter the Court’s opinion under Rule 59(e) and sought leave to file a third amended complaint.  TSC wanted to argue that the ARS robocalls at issue “serve no useful purpose to TSC and are, therefore, unwanted and a nuisance.”  On January 5, 2017, the Court denied TSC’s motion, reiterating that “a telecommunications service provider interested in commercial data collection for its customer-service offerings – does not fall ‘within the class of plaintiffs whom Congress has authorized to sue’ under the TCPA.”

TSC is expected to appeal the decision.  We will continue to monitor the case for developments.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Julie D. Hoffmeister Julie D. Hoffmeister

Julie is a partner primarily focusing on financial services litigation. She defends consumer-facing companies of all types in individual claims and class actions, including claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and the Telephone Consumer Protection…

Julie is a partner primarily focusing on financial services litigation. She defends consumer-facing companies of all types in individual claims and class actions, including claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Julie also applies her litigation knowledge in assisting businesses in developing compliance processes and procedures for the myriad federal consumer protection laws.

Photo of Ronald I. Raether, Jr. Ronald I. Raether, Jr.

Ron leads the firm’s Privacy + Cyber team. Drawing from nearly 30 years of experience, he provides comprehensive services to companies in all aspects of privacy, security, data use, and risk mitigation. Clients rely on his in-depth understanding of technology and its application

Ron leads the firm’s Privacy + Cyber team. Drawing from nearly 30 years of experience, he provides comprehensive services to companies in all aspects of privacy, security, data use, and risk mitigation. Clients rely on his in-depth understanding of technology and its application to their business to solve their most important challenges — from implementation and strategy to litigation and incident response. Ron and his team have redefined the boundaries of typical law firm privacy and cyber services in offering a 360 degree approach to tackling information governance issues. Their holistic services include drafting and implementing bespoke privacy programs, program implementation, licensing, financing and M&A transactions, incident response, privacy and cyber litigation, regulatory investigations, and enforcement experience.